Post by dnr08 on May 5, 2021 20:45:46 GMT
I thought it was odd to have Lawrence Reiter doing the trial from Canada, I believe Mr. Reiter was brought in to OPK through the Transition Theraputics buyout (his area code was canadian).
I'm pretty sure that I posted here, earlier this year, that I'd emailed Dr. Reiter with a question about the study. It was his name, as Jake says, listed as contact on CT.Gov. The text of the email is below, and I sent it on 1/25/21:
Hello Dr. Reiter,
I got your name and email from the clinical trials.gov web site. I have been an investor in Opko Health for 10 years. I’ve been looking for information regarding the rationale for the current Rayaldee for COVID study. I’ve read some of the literature about the calcifediol study in Spain, where the results appear to be encouraging. Since I’m 30 years out from my college biology degree, I’m clearly no expert. My question is simply what advantage does Rayaldee (which I understand to be calcifediol in extended release form) confer over the molecule/compound that was used in the study from Spain. I assume that there is a meaningful cost difference, and therefore I also assume that Opko’s study with Rayaldee is based on a hypothesis of potentially better, or faster, outcomes versus those from abroad.
Can you provide any basic information that addresses my question and/or assumptions?
Thank you in advance. All the best of health and success in 2021.
I never received a response. I'm still hurt.
Jake, who is the new person shown as the study contact?